# Valenta v. County of Los Angeles

> California Supreme Court · August 20, 1964 · 61 Cal. 2d 669

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451487

## Case

- **Full name:** RONALD J. VALENTA, and v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 20, 1964
- **Citations:** 61 Cal. 2d 669; 39 Cal. Rptr. 909; 394 P.2d 725; 1964 Cal. LEXIS 246
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Traynor
- **Judges:** Tobriner, Traynor
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451487

## Opinion text

TRAYNOR, J., Concurring.
Although I adhere to the views set forth in my dissenting opinion in Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343, 366-380 [ 144 P.2d 818 ], that ease is the law of this state until it is overruled. I therefore concur in the judgment herein under the compulsion of the Bacich case.
Respondents’ petition for a rehearing was denied September 18, 1964.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451487. Public record. Not legal advice.