# Pacific Bank v. Stone

> California Supreme Court · June 14, 1898 · 121 Cal. 202

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5449223

## Case

- **Full name:** PACIFIC BANK v. FRANK M. STONE
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 14, 1898
- **Citations:** 121 Cal. 202; 53 P. 634; 1898 Cal. LEXIS 875
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McFarland
- **Judges:** Chipman, McFarland
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5449223

## Opinion text

McFARLAND, J., concurring.
I concur in the judgment of affirmance. The judgment of the court below on the facts of this case is right. There are, however, some general expressions in the opinion of the commissioner about the employment of an attorney by the president of a bank which are, in my opinion, too broad to be correctly applied to the case of a solvent bank continuously engaged in the regular prosecution of its' usual business.
Hearing in Bank denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5449223. Public record. Not legal advice.