# City & County of San Francisco v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

> California Supreme Court · November 10, 1887 · 74 Cal. 113

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5443233

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. LIVERPOOL AND LONDON AND GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 10, 1887
- **Citations:** 74 Cal. 113; 15 P. 380; 1887 Cal. LEXIS 755
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McKinstry
- **Judges:** McKinstry, Temple
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5443233

## Opinion text

McKinstry, J., concurring.
— I concur with Justice Temple. I am of opinion, also, that the statute in question violates sections 31 and 32 of article 4, and section 6 of article 11, of the constitution; further, that the statute did not authorize, nor does it purport to authorize, the commencement and prosecution of the present action, and that the action is not authorized by any other law.
McFabland, J., and Seabls, O. J., dissented.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5443233. Public record. Not legal advice.