# Barton v. Brown

> California Supreme Court · November 19, 1885 · 68 Cal. 11

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5442286

## Case

- **Full name:** JOHN BARTON v. T. M. BROWN
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 19, 1885
- **Citations:** 68 Cal. 11; 8 P. 517; 1885 Cal. LEXIS 728
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Ross
- **Judges:** Ross
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5442286

## Opinion text

Ross, J.
— The plaintiff sued for the conversion of certain personal property by the defendant, alleged to have been at the time, and since, the property of the plaintiff. Plaintiff claims to have purchased the property from James N. Barton, but the evidence shows that the pretended sale was not followed by an actual or continued change of possession. The court below, however, held, as matter of law, that the property in question was exempt from execution in the hands of the vendor, James N. Barton, and therefore, “the sale was valid between the parties and all creditors, whether followed by continued change of possession, or not.” In this the court was in error. The right of exemption is a personal privilege, which, if not claimed, is waived by the debtor. Besides, a part of the property in question would not have been exempt under the statute in the hands of the debtor.
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
McKee, J., and McKinstry, J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5442286. Public record. Not legal advice.