# Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. Hagar

> California Supreme Court · October 28, 1884 · 66 Cal. 54

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441847

## Case

- **Full name:** RECLAMATION DISTRICT No. 108 v. GEORGE HAGAR
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 28, 1884
- **Citations:** 66 Cal. 54; 4 P. 945; 1884 Cal. LEXIS 682
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Myrickmckee
- **Judges:** McKee, McKinstry, Myrick, Sharpstein, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441847

## Opinion text

Myrick, J., and McKee, J., dissenting.
We concur in the foregoing opinion in all respects, except as to the admissibility of evidence concerning the payment of attorneys’ fees and for procuring legislation; in those respects, we think the evidence was admissible.
Rehearing denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441847. Public record. Not legal advice.