# Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. Hagar

> California Supreme Court · October 28, 1884 · 66 Cal. 54

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441845

## Case

- **Full name:** RECLAMATION DISTRICT No. 108 v. GEORGE HAGAR
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 28, 1884
- **Citations:** 66 Cal. 54; 4 P. 945; 1884 Cal. LEXIS 682
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Thornton
- **Judges:** McKee, McKinstry, Myrick, Sharpstein, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441845

## Opinion text

Thornton, J., specially concurring.
I concur in the above, except what is said in relation to the last point discussed. I think that the Act of 1868 was repealed as far as regards this point by the one hundred and sixteenth section of the Act of March 30, 1874 (see amendments to the Codes for 1873-’74, 60) ; therefore the action was properly brought in the name of the reclamation district. (Pol. Code, § 3466 ; People v. Sag-gin, 57 Cal. 579 .) The proceedings in regard to the assessment substantially followed the provisions of the Political Code.
I therefore concur in the judgment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441845. Public record. Not legal advice.