# Emeric v. Alvarado

> California Supreme Court · January 31, 1884 · 64 Cal. 529

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441558

## Case

- **Full name:** JOSEPH EMERIC v. JUAN B. ALVARADO, and EMILY TEWKSBURY, of the Will of Jacob M. Tewksbury
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 31, 1884
- **Citations:** 64 Cal. 529; 8 P.C.L.J. 1018; 2 P. 418; 1884 Cal. LEXIS 419
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Sharpstein
- **Judges:** McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 83 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441558

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding appeal of order appointing a receiver was not “a special order made after final judgment” because no final order had entered

## Opinion text

Sharpstein, J., concurring.
being the opinion of the majority of my brethren that the findings of the court below, with the exceptions specified by Mr. Justice Thornton, ought not to be disturbed, I concur in the foregoing judgment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5441558. Public record. Not legal advice.