# Pillsbury v. Brown

> California Supreme Court · July 1, 1872 · 45 Cal. 46

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5437857

## Case

- **Full name:** PILLSBURY v. BROWN and PILLSBURY v. MARTIN
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 1, 1872
- **Citations:** 45 Cal. 46
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5437857

## Opinion text

By the Court:
We are of the opinion that section four thousand three hundred and thirty of the Political Code as amended by the Act of March 28th, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 653), was intended to regulate the salaries of District Attorneys as contradistinguished from fees, to which they were entitled under existing laws, and was not intended and did not have the effect to repeal prior statutes, allowing fees in addition to salaries.
Peremptory mandate as prayed for ordered in each case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5437857. Public record. Not legal advice.