# Burgess v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 15, 1990 · 905 F.2d 1528

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/543254

## Case

- **Full name:** James H. Burgess v. John N. Brown E. Bowles John S. Kalbflesh, Captain R. Scott, Lieutenant Dennis Dusing, Hearing Officer Kevin M. Stauden, Co II R.E. Lushbaugh, Co II
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 15, 1990
- **Citations:** 905 F.2d 1528; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7949; 1990 WL 73686
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/543254

## Opinion text

905 F.2d 1528
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James H. BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John N. BROWN; E. Bowles; John S. Kalbflesh, Captain; R.
Scott, Lieutenant; Dennis Dusing, Hearing
Officer; Kevin M. Stauden, CO II; R.E.
Lushbaugh, CO II, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6906.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 1990.
Decided May 15, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-3267-R)
James H. Burgess, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ronald Mark Levitan, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Paul T. Cuzmanes, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Washington, D.C.; Aaron Isaac Lubling, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
James H. Burgess appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burgess v. Brown, C/A No. 88-3267-R (D.Md. Nov. 13, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/543254. Public record. Not legal advice.