# Danzig v. Diamond

> New York Supreme Court · March 18, 1943 · 180 Misc. 115

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5426901

## Case

- **Full name:** Elsie Danzig v. Ben Diamond
- **Court:** New York Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 18, 1943
- **Citations:** 180 Misc. 115; 40 N.Y.S.2d 407; 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1667
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Norton
- **Judges:** Norton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5426901

## Opinion text

Norton, J.
The action is brought against individual defendants as indorsers of a promissory note made by a corporation. The complaint alleges the making and delivery of the note in question, its indorsement, its presentation on the due date to the individual defendants, and a demand upon and refusal by the corporate maker. The complaint further alleges that subsequent to the due date the individual defendants herein made part payments on account of said note to plaintiff. Plaintiff is the holder thereof, and there is an unpaid balance due of $4,500 for which she seeks recovery.
The claim of insufficiency of the complaint is based upon the lack of any allegation therein of due notice of dishonor to the indorsers. On this motion, the court is confined to an examination of the pleading only.
Notice of dishonor to the indorsers, as well as notice of presentation, is essential to continue their liability. (Goldstein v. Brastone Corp., 254 App. Div. 288 .) Nevertheless “ notice of dishonor may be waived, either before the time of giving notice has arrived, or after the omission to give due notice, and the waiver may be express or implied.” (Negotiable Instruments Law, § 180.)
Paragraph “ Fourth ” of the complaint alleges that the defendants, subsequent to the due date of the note, made part payments thereon, which may constitute an implied waiver obviating the necessity of alleging due notice of dishonor. (Negotiable Instruments Law, § 180; Brown v. Mechanics & Traders’ Bank, 16 App. Div. 207 ; Linthicum v. Caswell, 19 App, *116 Div. 541, affd. 160 N. Y. 702 ; Commonwealth Fuel Co., Inc., v. Powpit Co., Inc., 212 App. Div. 553 .)
In my opinion, therefore, the complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the motion to dismiss will be denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5426901. Public record. Not legal advice.