# Everette O. Shrader v. Clarence L. Jackson, Chairman Virginia Parole Board > Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 23, 1990 · 904 F.2d 701 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/542600 ## Case - **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - **Decided:** May 23, 1990 - **Citations:** 904 F.2d 701; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8388; 1990 WL 77063 - **Precedential status:** Unpublished - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/542600 ## Opinion text 904 F.2d 701 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Everette O. SHRADER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Clarence L. JACKSON, Chairman; Virginia Parole Board, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-6506. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 7, 1990. Decided: May 23, 1990. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-912-R). Everette O. Shrader, appellant pro se. W.D.Va. DISMISSED. Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Everette O. Shrader seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Shrader v. Jackson, C/A No. 89-912-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/542600. Public record. Not legal advice.