# Brown v. Packard

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 20, 1990 · 900 F.2d 250

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/539378

## Case

- **Full name:** William Christopher Brown v. Ralph W. Packard, Warden, Mhc Leon Brown, Chief Security, Mhc Elizabeth Nick, Mhc, Mailroom Supervisor Patricia Clark, Mhc, Assistant Mailroom Supervisor Patricia Henson, Mhc, Mailroom Employee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 20, 1990
- **Citations:** 900 F.2d 250; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014; 1990 WL 33908
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/539378

## Opinion text

900 F.2d 250
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph W. PACKARD, Warden, MHC; Leon Brown, Chief Security,
MHC; Elizabeth Nick, MHC, Mailroom Supervisor; Patricia
Clark, MHC, Assistant Mailroom Supervisor; Patricia Henson,
MHC, Mailroom Employee, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7819.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 1990.
Decided March 20, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge. (C/A No. 87-2537-PN).
William Christopher Brown, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Karen U. Smith, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md. for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
William Christopher Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Packard, C/A No. 87-2537-PN (D.Md. Sept. 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/539378. Public record. Not legal advice.