# Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management

> Missouri Court of Appeals · August 29, 2017 · 527 S.W.3d 185

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287723

## Case

- **Full name:** Paul BROWN, Employee/Respondent v. DOMINO'S PIZZA/MBR MANAGEMENT, Employer/Appellant
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** August 29, 2017
- **Citations:** 527 S.W.3d 185; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 838; 2017 WL 3707465
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Dowd, Odenwald, Sullivan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287723

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Domino’s Pizza/MBR Management appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) awarding Paul Brown medical expenses. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude it contains sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri- Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287723. Public record. Not legal advice.