# Armstrong v. Special Administrative Board

> Missouri Court of Appeals · August 22, 2017 · 525 S.W.3d 215

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287553

## Case

- **Full name:** Jasmine ARMSTRONG v. The SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF the TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS and St. Louis Public Schools, and Joseph Guasto
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** August 22, 2017
- **Citations:** 525 S.W.3d 215; 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 808; 2017 WL 3597018
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Amburg, Dolan, Hoff
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287553

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM
Jasmine Armstrong appeals from the trial court’s “Order and Judgment” granting summary judgment in favor of the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis and the St. Louis Public Schools District. We affirm.
*216 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5287553. Public record. Not legal advice.