# Reeves v. Mo Board of Probation & Parole

> Missouri Court of Appeals · April 26, 2016 · 509 S.W.3d 128

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5286374

## Case

- **Full name:** Terry REEVES v. MO BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** April 26, 2016
- **Citations:** 509 S.W.3d 128; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 401; 2016 WL 1643253
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Gaertner, Hess, Quigless
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5286374

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Terry Reeves (“Appellant”) is currently incarcerated on his conviction of sexual assault. Appellant appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for declaratory judgment seeking review of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole’s (“Respondent”) cancellation of his conditional release date. Appellant asserts five points of circuit court error on appeal, primarily contending that the circuit court erred because Respondent canceled his conditional release date without a hearing. Appellant further contends Respondent unlawfully required him to successfully complete the Missouri Sexual Offenders Program (the “MoSOP”) to be eligible for conditional release. Appellant argues that his mental retardation rendered such requirement impossible to satisfy. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and we find the circuit court did not err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Crv. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5286374. Public record. Not legal advice.