# Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.

> Court of Appeals of Texas · November 25, 2015 · 482 S.W.3d 184

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5284885

## Case

- **Full name:** THE HUFF ENERGY FUND, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R. "Bill" Huff, Rick D'Angelo, Ed Dartley, Bryan Bloom, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC v. LONGVIEW ENERGY COMPANY
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 25, 2015
- **Citations:** 482 S.W.3d 184; 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 12094; 2015 WL 7731763
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Alyarez
- **Judges:** Alvarez, Alyarez, Angelini, Barnard, Chapa, Marion, Martinez, Patricia, Pulliam
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5284885

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that theories not expressly pled are not waived under notice pleading standards

## Opinion text

Patricia O. Alyarez, Justice,
concurring and dissenting,
Because I agree with the majority’s reasoning as to the insufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s findings on Usurpation of Corporate Opportunity, Jury Question Number One, I concur with only that section of the majority’s opinion. I do not, however, concur with the majority’s judgment. Instead, I agree with the dissent’s conclusion that liability is based on the jury’s answers regarding Competition, Jury Question Number Two. I, therefore, join the dissent on Jury Question Number Two and its assessment of available remedies to be determined by the trial .court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5284885. Public record. Not legal advice.