# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 27, 2014 · 431 S.W.3d 573

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5282582

## Case

- **Full name:** Andrew BROWN v. STATE of Missouri
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 27, 2014
- **Citations:** 431 S.W.3d 573; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 598; 2014 WL 2187515
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ellis, Gabbert, Mitchell
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5282582

## Opinion text

Order
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Brown appeals, following an evi-dentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. In his sole point on appeal, Brown contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he established that his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance when she allegedly promised him that if he pled open, the court would sentence him to no more than three or four years’ imprisonment. After receiving a sentence of six years’ imprisonment, Brown contends that had he known that pleading open meant that he could be sentenced to more than a total of three or four years’ imprisonment, he would not *574 have pled guilty but would have insisted on going to trial. .
We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5282582. Public record. Not legal advice.