# People v. Charles Schweinler Press

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · July 10, 1914 · 163 A.D. 620

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5233210

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. A Certain Corporation Called Charles Schweinler Press
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** July 10, 1914
- **Citations:** 163 A.D. 620; 32 N.Y. Crim. 74; 148 N.Y.S. 725; 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9339
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Clarke
- **Judges:** Clarke, Dowling, Hotchkiss, Ingraham
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5233210

## Opinion text

Clarke, J. (dissenting):
However much I might concur with the views of the presiding justice, I think this intermediate court is bound to follow the judgment of the court of last resort. If the Williams case is no longer an authority, it is for the Court of Appeals to say so. We have no power to review then' decision.
I, therefore, feel myself constrained to dissent upon that case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5233210. Public record. Not legal advice.