# Collier v. Postum Cereal Co.

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · February 16, 1912 · 149 A.D. 143

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5223436

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert J. Collier v. Postum Cereal Company, Limited
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** February 16, 1912
- **Citations:** 149 A.D. 143; 133 N.Y.S. 852; 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6362
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Ingraham
- **Judges:** Ingraham, Laughlin, Miller
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5223436

## Opinion text

Ingraham, P. J. (concurring):
The discussion of this case by Mr. Justice Laughlin points out various rulings upon questions of evidence, exceptions taken to the charge as made, and refusals to charge, which I think are erroneous, and an examination of the record discloses that in consequence of the rulings of the learned trial judge both in regard to evidence and passing upon the defendant’s requests to charge, the case was not presented to the jury in such a way as to preserve the rights of the defendant.
I also concur with Mr. Justice Miller and, therefore, vote for a new trial.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5223436. Public record. Not legal advice.