# In re the Marriage of King

> Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · November 25, 2015 · 371 P.3d 1139

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5178086

## Case

- **Full name:** In re the MARRIAGE OF Andrea Nicole KING, and Daniel Zebulon King
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** November 25, 2015
- **Citations:** 371 P.3d 1139; 2016 OK CIV APP 31; 2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 124; 2015 WL 10787999
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bell
- **Judges:** Bell, Buetiener, Goree
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5178086

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “when a court orders joint custody, 43 O.S. 2011 § 112.3 permits either parent to initiate the relocation procedure unless the order provides otherwise”

## Opinion text

«BELL, J.,
dissents with opinion. .
{ 32 There is a pattern to the actions of the mother, . She wants to create a barricade in between the father and the child, The evidence and the history of her multiple attempts to erode the relationship of the father and the child is clear, I cannot agree with the majority that she acted in good faith. If she feels the need to move to Texas, she can, qut not with the child. If she feels that it is *1145 not a hardship on the father to travel intrastate to visit his child, she should allow the father to continue to have custody. She can come back to Oklahoma to visit the child. This decision is not in the best interest of the child.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5178086. Public record. Not legal advice.