# Piatt v. Piatt

> Idaho Supreme Court · September 30, 1919 · 32 Idaho 407

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5171316

## Case

- **Full name:** FLORENCE PIATT v. EDWARD I. PIATT
- **Court:** Idaho Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 30, 1919
- **Citations:** 32 Idaho 407; 184 P. 470; 1919 Ida. LEXIS 62
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Morgan
- **Judges:** Budge, Morgan, Rice
- **Cited by:** 32 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5171316

## Opinion text

MORGAN, C. J.,
Dissenting. — I am in accord with the rules of law announced in the foregoing opinion, but am unable, by a very thorough search of the record, to find any evidence corroborating the testimony of respondent, nor any testimony which amounts to proof of an admission by appellant that he accused respondent of infidelity to him. The judgment of the trial court should be reversed because it is based upon the uncorroborated testimony of respondent, which testimony is insufficient when measured by the provision of C. L., sec. 2661, quoted in the majority opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5171316. Public record. Not legal advice.