# State v. Matthews

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · March 15, 1991 · 62 O.B.A.J. 944

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5163684

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Oklahoma v. Tommy W. MATTHEWS, and Eva L. Matthews
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** March 15, 1991
- **Citations:** 62 O.B.A.J. 944; 808 P.2d 691; 1991 OK CR 32; 1991 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34; 1991 WL 35103
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Johnson
- **Judges:** Brett, Lane, Lumpkin, Parks, Johnson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5163684

## Opinion text

JOHNSON,
Judge, concurs in part/dissents in part.
While I agree with the court in affirming the dismissal of the charges as it relates to 21 O.S.1981, § 341, I do wish to dissent as to dicta statements in the opinion that the appellee’s were not guilty of any other crimes that may have been committed. I do not believe the facts bear this out; there are possible prosecutions under other statutory sections (such as 21 O.S.1981, § 1454, Embezzlement by Trustee) that could come into play and the court should not make any statements as to other possible crimes or offenses and to that portion I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5163684. Public record. Not legal advice.