# Rodney D. Watson & Associates, P.C. v. Knight

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 27, 2013 · 305 P.3d 1039

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5158781

## Case

- **Full name:** RODNEY D. WATSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., an Oklahoma Corporation, and Rodney D. Watson, an individual v. Judith KNIGHT, individually, and Phoenix Central, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 27, 2013
- **Citations:** 305 P.3d 1039; 2013 OK 57; 2013 Okla. LEXIS 68; 2013 WL 3356982
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Colbert, Combs, Edmondson, Gurich, Kauger, Reif, Taylor, Watt, Winchester
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5158781

## Opinion text

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION
T1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Oka. S.Ct. Rule 1.201.
1 2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36 , 302 P.3d 775 and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Props., 2013 OK 37 , 302 P.3d 789 , dispose of the issues in this case.
13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court's dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 27 day of June, 2018.
COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., Concur.
WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ., Dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5158781. Public record. Not legal advice.