# Hutchinson v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · March 29, 1977 · 562 P.2d 867

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5153359

## Case

- **Full name:** Edward HUTCHINSON, and Pamela Jean Hutchinson v. The STATE of Oklahoma
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** March 29, 1977
- **Citations:** 562 P.2d 867; 1977 OK CR 125; 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 475
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Brett
- **Judges:** Bussey, Bliss, Brett
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5153359

## Opinion text

BRETT, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur that this sentence should be modified, insofar as the judgment and sentence is being affirmed; but I dissent to that part of the opinion that affirms the judgment and sentence. I would reverse this conviction because it appears to me that the arrest was premised upon a subterfuge and was therefore an illegal arrest. I question also the validity of the search of the vehicle, as was done in this case. Therefore, I dissent to the affirmance of this conviction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5153359. Public record. Not legal advice.