# Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chronister

> Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · September 2, 2004 · 76 O.B.A.J. 1330

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5152716

## Case

- **Full name:** OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC CO. v. Christopher Charles CHRONISTER, The Workers' Compensation Court
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** September 2, 2004
- **Citations:** 76 O.B.A.J. 1330; 114 P.3d 455; 2005 OK CIV APP 32; 2004 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 114; 2005 WL 1349102
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Buettner
- **Judges:** Adams, Buettner, Jones
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5152716

## Opinion text

BUETTNER, V.C.J./P.J.,
concurring in part, dissenting in part:
I agree with the majority opinion except for the decision regarding the van. I am not convinced that 85 O.S.2001 § 14(A)(1) provides authority to compel an employer to provide a van under the term “apparatus as may be necessary after the injury.”

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5152716. Public record. Not legal advice.