# Board of County Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 27, 1961 · 363 P.2d 267

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5146660

## Case

- **Full name:** BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MURRAY COUNTY, Oklahoma, in Error v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION of the State of Oklahoma, in Error
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 27, 1961
- **Citations:** 363 P.2d 267; 1961 OK 167; 1961 Okla. LEXIS 372
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Berry, Blackbird, Davison, Halley, Irwin, Jackson, Johnson, Welch, Williams
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5146660

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error appeals from the same order of the State Board of Equalization that was appealed from in other cases decided June 13, 1961, including Cause No. 39,-321, Board of County Commissioners of Canadian County, Oklahoma v. State Board of Equalization of State of Oklahoma, Okl., 363 P.2d 242 . As to Murray County, here involved, the order required the same respective percentages of increase in valuations for rural and urban property that it required in the county involved in the cited case.
There is no material difference between the arguments advanced herein by plaintiff in error and those urged under three of the appellant’s propositions for reversal in Cause No. 39,321. We, therefore, apply what was therein said concerning those arguments, to the arguments of plaintiff in error herein, and adopt, by reference, those pronouncements as our opinion in this case.
Affirmed.
Due to the exigencies related to the element of time affecting the situation involved herein, the usual IS day period allowed by' this Court’s Rule No. 28 for the filing of petitions for rehearing generally, is, as applied to this case, reduced to 10 days.
WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON and BERRY, JJ., concur.
IRWIN, J., concurs specially.
JACKSON, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5146660. Public record. Not legal advice.