# Hall v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · April 11, 2012 · 2012 Ark. App. 245

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5114345

## Case

- **Full name:** Roger HALL v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Minor child
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** April 11, 2012
- **Citations:** 2012 Ark. App. 245; 413 S.W.3d 542; 2012 Ark. App. LEXIS 356; 2012 WL 1194002
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hart
- **Judges:** Hart, Robbins, Vaught
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5114345

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that issue of ICWA compliance was not preserved for appeal where there was no evidence in the record that it was raised below

## Opinion text

HART, J., concurring.
I concur because, in affirming, we are following the law as created by the court of appeals just a few short months ago in Glover v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 2011 Ark. App. 748 , 387 S.W.3d 224 . However, I believe that the Glover case was wrongly decided for the reasons that I set out in my lengthy dissent in that case.
Here, we have yet another nonoffending parent living out of state who was unable to surmount the barriers that ADHS placed in his way in order to gain custody of his biological |12child. To Mr. Hall’s credit, he was trying to step up and take care of his child. The people of Arkansas should expect nothing less.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5114345. Public record. Not legal advice.