# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · April 16, 2013 · 397 S.W.3d 43

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5113037

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Jerome BROWN, a/k/a Jaronte Brown, a/k/a Gerome Brown, a/k/a J. Brown v. State Of Missouri
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** April 16, 2013
- **Citations:** 397 S.W.3d 43; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 456; 2013 WL 1615583
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Amburg, Crane, Hoff
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5113037

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jerome Brown appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator, Section 632.480 et seq. RSMo Cum.Supp.2009. Brown contends the trial court plainly erred in allowing testimony based on police investigations which did not result in convictions and erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5113037. Public record. Not legal advice.