# Edmisten v. Bull Shoals Landing

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · January 11, 2012 · 2012 Ark. App. 44

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5112231

## Case

- **Full name:** Matthew L. EDMISTEN v. BULL SHOALS LANDING & AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** January 11, 2012
- **Citations:** 2012 Ark. App. 44; 388 S.W.3d 416; 2012 Ark. App. LEXIS 112
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hart
- **Judges:** Abramson, Agree, Brown, Glover, Hart, Hoofman, Martin, Pittman, Robbins, Vaught
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5112231

## Opinion text

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge, concurring.
My reason for joining the majority in this case is set out in my concurring opinion in a companion case, Prock v. Bull Shoals Landing, 2012 Ark. App. 47 , 390 S.W.3d 78 , handed down this same day, January 11, 2012. I do note that the administrative law judge, whose opinion was adopted by the Commission, applied to this case the analysis I set out in my Prock concurrence.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5112231. Public record. Not legal advice.