# Harris v. Johnson

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · March 30, 2011 · 2011 Ark. App. 243

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5111568

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert S. HARRIS, Jr. v. Tim JOHNSON
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** March 30, 2011
- **Citations:** 2011 Ark. App. 243; 383 S.W.3d 409; 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 246
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Gladwin
- **Judges:** Abramson, Agree, Gladwin, Glover, Hoofman, Martin, Vaught
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5111568

## Opinion text

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge, concurring.
I concur that this case must be affirmed, but believe that it must be affirmed under the law-of-the-case doctrine. I agree with Chief Judge Vaught’s analysis that Harris was protected from the tort suit by Ark. Code Ann. § ll-9-105(a) (Repl.2002). However, our court held otherwise. See Johnson v. Ark. Steel Erectors, 2009 Ark. App. 755 , 350 S.W.3d 801 . Therefore, we are bound by that decision under the law-of-the-case doctrine. See Green v. George’s Farms, Inc., 2011 Ark. 70 , 378 S.W.3d 715 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5111568. Public record. Not legal advice.