# Bray v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.

> Court of Appeals of Texas · February 2, 2012 · 363 S.W.3d 777

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5109627

## Case

- **Full name:** Brett BRAY, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation and Gulf States Toyota, Inc., Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. TEJAS TOYOTA, INC., Brett Bray, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** February 2, 2012
- **Citations:** 363 S.W.3d 777; 2012 WL 370571
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Henson
- **Judges:** Henson, Jones, Pemberton
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5109627

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting importance of difference in adjacent statutory language

## Opinion text

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of the discussion of the statutory duty of *788 good faith and fair dealing found in footnote eleven. Because we need not address the applicability of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing to dispose of the appeal, I decline to join footnote eleven of the majority opinion. See Tex.R.App. P. 47. 1 (courts of appeals must hand down written opinion that is brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of appeal).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5109627. Public record. Not legal advice.