# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · October 10, 2006 · 203 S.W.3d 240

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107455

## Case

- **Full name:** Arlen Bert BROWN, Movant/Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 10, 2006
- **Citations:** 203 S.W.3d 240; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498; 2006 WL 2864732
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Crane, Richter, Sullivan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107455

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arlen Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief (Motion). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum to the parties, for their use *241 only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107455. Public record. Not legal advice.