# Horton v. Board of Education

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2006 · 191 S.W.3d 687

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107040

## Case

- **Full name:** Brenda HORTON, Claimant/Appellant v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, and The Second Injury Fund, Respondents/Respondents
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 16, 2006
- **Citations:** 191 S.W.3d 687; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 696
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Baker, Dowd, Sullivan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107040

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brenda Horton appeals from the Final Award Allowing Compensation of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion (Commission’s Final Award). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s *688 Final Award supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. See Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo.banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. . We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5107040. Public record. Not legal advice.