# Brown v. Lineberry

> Missouri Court of Appeals · February 28, 2006 · 184 S.W.3d 596

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5106814

## Case

- **Full name:** Lorne BROWN v. Barbara Ann LINEBERRY
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 28, 2006
- **Citations:** 184 S.W.3d 596; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 233; 2006 WL 461111
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Holliger, Howard, Spinden
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5106814

## Opinion text

Order
PER CURIAM.
Lome Brown (“Brown”) appeals from a judgment following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County in favor of Barbara Lineberry (“Lineberry”) in Brown’s breach of written agreement action against Lineberry. In his sole point on appeal, Brown argues that the trial court erred in entering judgment in favor of Lineberry, because Missouri law allows custodial parents to waive the right to recover past-due child support, in that Li-neberry induced Brown to sign a consent for adoption, Brown relinquished his visitation rights and Lineberry allowed Brown to believe that the adoption was proceeding.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5106814. Public record. Not legal advice.