# Day v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Division of the Board of Probation & Parole

> Missouri Court of Appeals · January 25, 2005 · 153 S.W.3d 350

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105757

## Case

- **Full name:** Paul DAY, Pro Se v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIVISION OF the BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, and, Fannie Gaw, Member Division of Board of Probation and Parole
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 25, 2005
- **Citations:** 153 S.W.3d 350; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 106; 2005 WL 147265
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Breckenridge, Ellis, Holliger
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105757

## Opinion text

ORDER
Paul Day and his parents brought a declaratory judgment action alleging that Day was entitled to a new parole hearing and that he was improperly denied jail time credit by the Missouri Department of Corrections. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants and the Days appeal. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105757. Public record. Not legal advice.