# Katz v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

> Missouri Court of Appeals · September 7, 2004 · 147 S.W.3d 813

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105536

## Case

- **Full name:** Harry M. KATZ, M.D. v. MISSOURI BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR the HEALING ARTS
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 7, 2004
- **Citations:** 147 S.W.3d 813; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Crahan, Hoff, Mooney
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105536

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Harry M. Katz, M.D. (“Doctor”) appeals the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission and the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (collectively “Commission”). 1
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for om* decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. For purposes of judicial review, the decision of the Commission and the subsequent disciplinary order of the Missouri Board of Registration are treated as one decision. Perez v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Mo.App.1991).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5105536. Public record. Not legal advice.