# State ex rel. Employees of Retirement System of St. Louis v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment of St. Louis

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 2001 · 43 S.W.3d 887

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100431

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Missouri, ex rel. EMPLOYEES OF RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS v. BOARD OF ESTIMATE & APPORTIONMENT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 1, 2001
- **Citations:** 43 S.W.3d 887; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 709
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Dowd, Russell, Teitelman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100431

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Members of the Board of Trustees of the Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis (“Appellants”) appeal the denial of their Petition in Mandamus. Appellants contend that the Board of Estimate and Apportionment (“Respondents”) was under a ministerial duty to include a contribution to the retirement system for fiscal year 2001.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment *888 is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100431. Public record. Not legal advice.