# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · February 20, 2001 · 43 S.W.3d 390

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100398

## Case

- **Full name:** Larry G. BROWN, Movant v. STATE of Missouri
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 20, 2001
- **Citations:** 43 S.W.3d 390; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 291; 2001 WL 167792
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Blackmar, Crane, Hoff
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100398

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5100398. Public record. Not legal advice.