# Piccinino v. City of St. Louis

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 1996 · 921 S.W.2d 150

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5090345

## Case

- **Full name:** Carlo PICCININO, Plaintiff/Respondent v. The CITY OF ST. LOUIS, BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 7, 1996
- **Citations:** 921 S.W.2d 150; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 785
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ahrens, Pudlowski, Simon
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5090345

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Board of Building Appeals of the City of St. Louis appeals the judgment of the circuit court reversing the board’s denial of appeals by petitioner Carlo Piccinino concerning a notice of condemnation and a notice of code violations issued on properties owned by petitioner.
The trial court did not err in finding the board’s decision was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5090345. Public record. Not legal advice.