# Uptmore v. Jones

> Court of Appeals of Texas · April 13, 1994 · 875 S.W.2d 422

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5085688

## Case

- **Full name:** James H. UPTMORE v. William Ray JONES, Jr.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** April 13, 1994
- **Citations:** 875 S.W.2d 422; 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1204; 1994 WL 123587
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Chapa
- **Judges:** Lopez, Chapa, Butts
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5085688

## Opinion text

CHAPA, Chief Justice,
concurring.
I concur with the majority.
While I sympathize with the equitable concerns of the dissent, unlike the Texas Supreme Court, we have no authority to change the rules and thus accept a late filed statement of facts in the absence of a timely filed motion for extension of time. Tex.Gov’t *429 Code Ann. §§ 22.003(a)-(b) (Vernon 1988); Tex.R.App.P. 54(c); B.D. Click Co. v. Safari Drilling Corp., 638 S.W.2d 860, 862 (Tex.1982).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5085688. Public record. Not legal advice.