# State v. Brown

> Missouri Court of Appeals · September 21, 1993 · 862 S.W.2d 926

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5084326

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Keith A. BROWN, Defendant/Appellant Keith A. BROWN, Movant/Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 21, 1993
- **Citations:** 862 S.W.2d 926
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5084326

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5084326. Public record. Not legal advice.