# Hemphill Contracting Co. v. Board of Adjustment

> Missouri Court of Appeals · February 26, 1991 · 810 S.W.2d 517

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5078972

## Case

- **Full name:** HEMPHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 26, 1991
- **Citations:** 810 S.W.2d 517; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 264; 1991 WL 22327
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5078972

## Opinion text

*518 ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order which found plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to establish nonconforming use.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5078972. Public record. Not legal advice.