# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · December 5, 1989 · 783 S.W.2d 428

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5075943

## Case

- **Full name:** Glen BROWN v. STATE of Missouri
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 5, 1989
- **Citations:** 783 S.W.2d 428; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1726; 1989 WL 146999
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5075943

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). The time limits as to when a Rule 29.15 motion must be filed are constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 [3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5075943. Public record. Not legal advice.