# Cannamore v. Bi-State Development Agency

> Supreme Court of Missouri · July 17, 1972 · 484 S.W.2d 308

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5039502

## Case

- **Full name:** Chaney CANNAMORE v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a Corporation, Defendant-Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Missouri
- **Decided:** July 17, 1972
- **Citations:** 484 S.W.2d 308; 93 A.L.R. 3d 771; 1972 Mo. LEXIS 874
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bardgett
- **Judges:** Bard, Bardgett, Donnelly, Finch, Gett, Henley, Holman, Morgan, Seiler
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5039502

## Opinion text

BARDGETT, Judge
(dissenting).
I believe that Brindley v. Wells, 308 Mo. 1 , 271 S.W. 48 , was a proper application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine to carrier-passenger cases and ought not to be overruled. Under Brindley v. Wells, plaintiff made a submissible case. For this reason I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5039502. Public record. Not legal advice.