# Brown v. Poff

> Texas Supreme Court · April 28, 1965 · 392 S.W.2d 113

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5029792

## Case

- **Full name:** W. A. BROWN, Doing Business as Brown Trucking Company v. Joe F. POFF
- **Court:** Texas Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 28, 1965
- **Citations:** 392 S.W.2d 113
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5029792

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The application for writ of error does not disclose a properly presented error which would justify the reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. Accordingly we deny the application with the notation, “Refused, no reversible error.” This action should not be taken as an approval of the Court of Civil Appeals holding ( 387 S.W.2d 101 ) that, when raised by the evidence, the issue of whether or not a plaintiff has sustained an injury is a “defendant’s issue” within the meaning of Rule 279, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. There is a marked distinction between the term “defendant’s issue” as generally used in connection with Rule 279 and the term “vital defensive issue,” as used in Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Van Zandt, 159 Tex. 178 , 317 S.W.2d 528 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5029792. Public record. Not legal advice.