# Beezley v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · November 16, 1927 · 1 S.W.2d 903

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5000781

## Case

- **Full name:** BEEZLEY v. STATE
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 16, 1927
- **Citations:** 1 S.W.2d 903
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Hawkins
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Lattimore
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5000781

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that article 22.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure “mandates the entry of judgment in the full amount of the bond except where exoneration is proper under Art. 22.13 [] or remittitur is discretionary under Art. 22.16 [I. On the basis of the facts and the applicable l…

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
HAWKINS, J.
No questions are called to our attention as having been overlooked in the original consideration of the case, and all points which are again stressed in appellant’s motion have been carefully re-exam *906 ined. No doubt exists in our mind as to tbe correctness of tbe disposition of tbis appeal. To write further would necessitate repetition wbicb would serve no useful purpose.
Tbe motion for rebearing is overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5000781. Public record. Not legal advice.