# STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUPRIE E. WADLEY (17-07-0389, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · September 29, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4995533

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** September 29, 2021
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4995533

## Opinion text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2040-18

STATE OF NEW JERSEY,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JUPRIE E. WADLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.
________________________

Submitted September 22, 2021- Decided September 29, 2021

Before Judges Fuentes, Gooden Brown, and Gummer.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law
Division, Mercer County, Indictment No. 17-07-0389.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for
appellant (Tamar Y. Lerer, Assistant Deputy Public
Defender, of counsel and on the briefs).

Angelo J. Onofri, Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney
for respondent (Laura Sunyak, Assistant Prosecutor, of
counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM
We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably

adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

A-2040-18
2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4995533. Public record. Not legal advice.