# Steve Wool v. William Hinkel Barbara Zentz Joseph P. Murphy Janet A. Brown Stanley Friedler

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 25, 1987 · 833 F.2d 1006

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/497516

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 25, 1987
- **Citations:** 833 F.2d 1006; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15487; 1987 WL 39076
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/497516

## Opinion text

833 F.2d 1006
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steve WOOL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William HINKEL; Barbara Zentz; Joseph P. Murphy; Janet A.
Brown; Stanley Friedler, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-1165.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Nov. 25, 1987.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Steve Wool, appellant pro se.
PER CURIAM:
1
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Wool v. Hinkel, C/A No. 87-1896-H (D.Md. Aug. 4, 1987).
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/497516. Public record. Not legal advice.