# Jesse Brumely and Thomas Crum v. George Wilson Al C. Parker J.W. Travis Bobby Burchett and Timothy Barnes

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · October 30, 1987 · 831 F.2d 1063

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/496442

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 30, 1987
- **Citations:** 831 F.2d 1063; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14503; 1987 WL 38862
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/496442

## Opinion text

831 F.2d 1063
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Jesse BRUMELY and Thomas Crum, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
George WILSON; Al C. Parker; J.W. Travis; Bobby
Burchett; and Timothy Barnes, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 86-5544.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 30, 1987.
Before MERRITT, KRUPANSKY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The Appellants timely appealed from an order in which the district court sua sponte granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Jesse Brumley (Brumley) and Thomas Crum (Crum). The district court held that Brumley and Crum were subjected to a prison disciplinary proceeding that failed to afford minimum procedural due process of law, and that the Appellants were not protected by qualified immunity. The Appellants were not given an opportunity to oppose the sua sponte motion prior to the district court's decision to grant partial summary judgment.
2
Upon consideration of the briefs of counsel and the pro se brief submitted by Brumley and Crum, together with the record herein, it is determined that the Appellants should have been permitted time in which to file a response in opposition to the motion. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/496442. Public record. Not legal advice.