# Commonwealth v. Williams

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · June 9, 2005 · 2005 Pa. Super. 217

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4961679

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Gomer Robert WILLIAMS, Jr.
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** June 9, 2005
- **Citations:** 2005 Pa. Super. 217; 877 A.2d 471; 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1469
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Elliott
- **Judges:** Elliott, Green, Lally, Musmanno
- **Cited by:** 22 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4961679

## Opinion text

FORD ELLIOTT, J.,
Dissenting:
¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court properly complied fully with our Supreme Court’s remand and considered the remaining issues presented by appellant. Those issues, as questions of law, have since been addressed by this court; and therefore, the trial court is bound by the decisions of the Superior Court. Alternatively, if an evidentiary hearing was required, any new evidence presented would unavoidably highlight appellant’s problems with standing. I would affirm the trial court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4961679. Public record. Not legal advice.